【摘 要】
:
Objective: Comparing and analyzing clinical and radiological outcomes of open versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) for single-level lumbar degenerative disease p
【出 处】
:
海峡两岸骨科专委会学术交流会、抗震救灾五周年学术研讨会暨第十届华西国际骨科论坛
论文部分内容阅读
Objective: Comparing and analyzing clinical and radiological outcomes of open versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) for single-level lumbar degenerative disease prospectively.Method: From February 2010 to February 2011,105 single-level open and MIS TLIF were performed at our centre and were followed up more than at least 18 months.Among them, 43 cases who underwent MIS-TLIF as trail group, 62 cases who underwent traditional open TLIF as control group.In the case group, mild spondylolisthesis were 20 , lumbar stenosis were 14 , lumbar vertebrae unsteady were 9 , all underwent single-level MIS-TLIF with single cage through MLDS (Micro Lumbar Distractor System) and Wiltse approach.In the control group, mild spondylolisthesis were 32 , lumbar stenosis were 20, lumbar vertebrae unsteady were 10, all underwent single-level open-TLIF with single cage.Comparing and analyzing clinical and radiological outcomes of both groups such as the operation time, the blood loss intra-operatively, the blood loss post-operatively, the radiation exposure time, post-operative hospital stay, post-operative complications, fusion, cage dislocation and sink, the VAS and ODI of post-operation and follow up.Results: There was no significant difference in pre-operative information between two groups.MIS-TLIF group was superior to OPEN-TLIF group in the the blood loss intra-operatively, the blood loss post-operatively, post-operative hospital stay statistically (P<0.05).The MIS group had a significant longer radiation time (P<0.05).There were no significant difference in operation time, VAS and ODI of post-operation and follow up between two groups (P>0.05).In each group, there was a significant difference in VAS and ODI Of pre-operation and post-operation (P<0.05).Conclusion: MIS-TLIF surgical technique is a safe and reliable method.It has some advantages such as less invasion, quick recovery and may partly replace OPEN-TLIF.
其他文献
背景:在脊柱结核后路稳定性重建手术中,常规方法是实行短节段或长节段固定或/和融合.这种方法牺牲了一个以上正常运动单元,限制了脊柱正常运动功能,并导致了相邻节段小关节的退变.如何减少融合、固定节段,最大限度地保留脊柱的运动功能,是脊柱结核手术治疗中亟待解决的问题之一.目的:探讨短椎弓根螺钉在脊柱结核单节段固定手术治疗中的可行性、适应证及疗效.方法:106例腰骶椎结核患者,随机分为二组,先进行后路矫形
目的:探讨俯卧位脊柱后路手术的体位护理措施及效果。方法:对笔者所在医院于2011年5月~2012年10月收治的72例行脊柱后路手术患者的病历资料进行回顾性分析,同时总结其护理措施及相关体会。结果:72例脊柱手术患者在行以上俯卧位护理情况下均达到预期手术要求,均未发生任何严重并发症及护理不当事件,其中仅有4例因受压表现有轻微面部肿胀及3例股外侧皮神麻痹,但经术后给予相应处理均很快恢复,因此整体结果令
目的:对比分析腰椎ISOBAR TTL动态内固定与经后路钉棒系统内固定术(PLIF腰椎后路椎体间融合)治疗腰椎退行性疾病的临床疗效.方法:分别采用ISOBAR TTL动态内固定及经后路钉棒系统内固定术(PLIF腰椎后路椎体间融合)治疗腰椎退行性病变各30例,每组平均随访时间1.5年以上,采用VAS(疼痛视觉模拟)评分、JOA评分,并对比观察两组间手术时间、术中出血量、术后住院时间、住院费用以及末次
目的:分析比较颈椎动态装置植入术(Dynamic cervical Inplant,DCI)与颈前路减压植骨融合术(Anterior ceryical discectomy and fusion,ACDF)治疗颈椎间盘突出症的早期疗效.方法:2010年10月至2011年2月,4例患者行DCI(A组),7例患者行ACDF(B组),于术前、出院前、术后6周、3月随访,通过日本矫形外科协会(JOA)评分
目的:探讨脊柱结核伴畸形一期单纯后路病灶清除矫形术的临床疗效。方法:总结2005年1月~2012年1月采用单纯后路病灶清除矫形术治疗脊柱结核伴畸形一期的23例患者的临床资料。评价住院时间、住院费用、手术时间、手术费用、术中出血量、神经症状缓解情况、畸形矫正率、复发率、并发症发生率、JOA评分、植骨融合情况,采用3/6/9随访方式,即术后3、6、9个月随访,以后每年复查1次。结果:平均手术时间4h,
目的:探讨脊柱肿瘤全椎切除方法.方法:回顾分析我院2008-10-2011-7采用全椎切除治疗脊柱肿瘤8例患者的临床资料,胸腰椎骨巨细胞瘤3例,乳腺癌转移1例,尤文瘤1例,骨肉瘤1例;颈7椎肺癌转移瘤1例,颈3椎腺癌1例.8例病员病变破坏均累计椎体椎弓.结果:手术平均出血1800ml,手术时间2-7小时,术后患处疼痛完全缓解,神经功能完全恢复正常无一例神经功能加重.2年-3月复查肿瘤无复发.所有病
目的:探讨后路椎间盘镜(MED)治疗腰椎间盘突出症的手术疗效.方法:我科2008年3月-2012年3月采用后路椎间盘镜(MED)治疗腰椎间盘突出症230例,其中男例132例,女例98;年龄16-69岁,平均45岁;病程0.5-7年,平均2.5年;X线、CT或MRI示L4-5突出88例,L5-S1 94例,L4-5并L5-S1 33例,L3-4、L4-5及L5-S1 15例;突出型103例,脱出游离
目的:探讨老年人腰椎间盘突出症的临床特点及手术治疗的效果。方法:本组48例中,男性32例,女性16例。年龄60-71岁,病程3个月-20年不等,全部病例均为腰4-5及腰5-骶1椎间盘突出。手术前均常规行X线、cT及MRI检查,均显示腰椎退变,骨质增生,椎间盘不同程度突出,部分病例椎间盘游离到椎管,部分病例有退变性不稳。对48例老年人腰椎间盘突出症的临床特点进行分析并对手术后效果进行随访,随访时间6
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Accidental durotomy causing CSF leak is a common complication of spine surgery.Up to now, the optimal treatment method remains unproven.Current core treatment concept has been focu
目的:通过病例-对照回顾性研究,总结分析颈椎后路单开门椎板扩大成形术(ELAP)减压节段范围对脊髓后移幅度的影响情况,进一步明确规范后路手术适应症,以及明确选择颈椎后路手术减压范围的标准.方法:根据入选标准(1,术前、后必须要有完善的颈椎MRI影像学资料;2,术前颈椎曲度不是后凸的患者;3,初次行颈椎单开门椎管扩大成形术;4,随访时间超过6个月),总计有76人符合入选标准.并且将这76例根据手术方