论文部分内容阅读
在《普通法审判中的英美证据法专论》(以下简称《专论》)~①中,从一开始,威格莫尔便力图超越对证据规范的单纯解释:他详细而深刻地研究了几乎所有重要规则的历史和原理,而且他还将相当数量的有关法庭心理学和法庭科学的材料都包括在内。与此同时,他沿着塞耶的路子,将那些他觉得通常属于实体法或程序法的问题都排除在证据法之外。虽然威格莫尔的《专论》无论作为一部学术
From the very beginning, Wigmore sought to go beyond the mere interpretation of the norms of evidence in the Monographs of Anglo-American Law of Evidence in the Common Law Trial (hereinafter referred to as “monographs”): He studied in detail and profoundly The history and principles of almost all the important rules, and he also includes a considerable amount of material on forensic psychology and forensic science. At the same time, he follows the way of Sayel, excluding issues that he feels usually belong to substantive or procedural law, outside the law of evidence. Although Wigmore’s “monograph” both as an academic