如何评价清末新政,是能否正确认识这场改革的性质与历史作用的问题。20世纪80年代之前,学术界很少有对新政肯定的评价,大都斥之为“骗局”、“假维新”、“伪变法”;80年代以降,学术界逐步给予新政以基本肯定的评价。但有关清末新政和辛亥革命的关系的专门论著尚属罕见。笔者不揣浅陋,就此谈点不成熟的意见。请专家们教正。 How to evaluate the New Deal in the late Qing Dynasty is a question of whether we can correctly understand the nature and historical role of this reform. Before the 1980s, there were few academic evaluations that affirmed the New Deal, most of which were scolded as “scam”, “fake new”, “pseudo-change”; in the 1980s, the academic community gradually gave the New Deal To basically confirm the evaluation. However, special treatises on the relationship between the New Deal in the late Qing Dynasty and the Revolution of 1911 are still rare. I do not guess humble, talk about immature opinions. Please experts to correct it.