论文部分内容阅读
从20世纪90年代末至今,国内有关拉康无意识的研究为数不多,且对其内涵的理解从总体上呈现出社会和文化化的倾向。然而究其实质而言,拉康虽然超越了弗洛伊德的力比多主义而将无意识定义作了语言,却仅仅是基于语言对无意识的明证作用而作出的界定。实际上,拉康无意识的指归并不在于社会和文化层面,而是在于本体或存在层面。拉康无意识是作为存身于真实域即存在或哲学的界域从而超越了生物性或心理性的意识假主体的人的真正主体而存在的,其存在可通过直觉以及语言/能指的方式来加以确认。
Since the late 1990s till now, there are only a few studies on Lacan’s unconsciousness in China, and their understanding of their connotation generally shows social and cultural tendencies. However, in essence, though Lacan transcends Freiberidian libidoism and defines unconscious as the language, it is only based on the linguistic definition of unconscious evidence. In fact, Lacan’s unconscious refers to the social and cultural aspects, but ontology or existential level. Lacan’s unconsciousness exists as the true subject of the person who resides in the realm, ie, the existence or the philosophical realm, which goes beyond the biological or psychological consciousness, and its existence can be intuitively and verbally / empirically Confirm.