论文部分内容阅读
一般地说,大家都认为维特根斯坦思想的转变主要得益于弗兰克·兰姆塞和P.斯拉法的批评,原因是,这是作者在《哲学研究》前言中不打自招的事实。我们认为这一点不足为凭。或者,我们认为作者在这一点上并非足够的诚实。真相是,作者在特拉滕巴赫当乡村教师时,就已经开始着手拆解他一手搭建的哲学高屋了(指《逻辑哲学论》)。最充足的证据,就是在教书期间,维特根斯坦编纂了一本《小学生德语词典》,并于1926年出版。对于这一事件,赵敦华
In general, we all agree that the shift in Wittgenstein’s thinking is mainly due to the criticisms of Frank Lambsse and P. Sfalaf, because this is the fact that the author did not call himself in the foreword to “philosophical research” . We think this is not enough. Or, we think the author is not honest enough at this point. The truth is that when the author became a village teacher in Trahttenbach, he began to disassemble the philosophical house he built (referring to the “logic of philosophy”). The most adequate evidence is that during teaching, Wittgenstein compiled a “German Dictionary of Pupils”, published in 1926. For this incident, Zhao Dunhua