论文部分内容阅读
“掏鸟窝案”的判决完全符合刑法和刑事司法解释的规定,但是从超实证法的层面上来说,该案量刑过重。量刑过重的根源在于刑事司法解释规定的不合理。由于司法解释具有强制拘束力导致法官在面对不合理的司法解释时,不敢超越司法解释以作出最佳的裁判。刑事司法解释的刑法渊源地位无法得到有效证成,其强制拘束力缺乏有力支撑。法官在定罪和量刑中的自由裁量权应当得到充分保障,应当允许法官有条件的突破刑事司法解释。刑事司法解释的强制拘束力可以逐步消退,而最终只具有参考性。
“Dig bird nest case ” of the verdict in full compliance with criminal law and criminal justice interpretation of the provisions, but from the super-positivist level, the case sentenced too much. Excessive sentencing lies in the criminal justice interpretation of the unreasonable provisions. Due to the compulsory binding of judicial interpretation, judges can not dare to go beyond judicial interpretation to make the best judgment in the face of unreasonable judicial interpretation. The origin of the criminal law of criminal judicial interpretation can not be validly proven, and its compulsory binding force lacks strong support. The judge’s discretion in conviction and sentencing should be fully guaranteed, and the judge should be allowed to break the criminal justice interpretation conditionally. The compulsory binding force of criminal judicial interpretation can be gradually dissipated, but in the end it is only of reference.