不少教师在谈及自己的职业时,习惯性地将自己戏称为“教书匠”。粗听之,这种说法并无多大的不妥。然而细加推敲,这句话却包含着两个明显的错误:第一,从教育目的来看,我们的宗旨不仅仅在于教书,教书只不过是一种手段,其终极目标却是育人;第二,从教育内容来看,我们也并不仅仅用书来教育学生。自然,书虽然是我们教育教学过程中不可或缺的媒介,而教育者自身的人格力量、表率作用却常常会在育人过程中产生一种潜移默化的作用,悄无声息地感染着受教育者的心灵,塑造着受教育者的灵魂。古人所谓的“言传身教”中的“身教”二字,所体现出的正是施教者在教书之外的一种潜在的力量。 When talking about their careers, many teachers habitually call themselves “teaching bookmakers.” Rough listening, this argument is not much wrong. However, careful scrutiny, but this sentence contains two obvious errors: First, from the educational purposes, our purpose is not only teaching, teaching is only a means, the ultimate goal is to educate people; Second, from an educational perspective, we do not just use books to educate students. Naturally, although the book is an indispensable medium in our education and teaching process, its own personality force and exemplary role often produce a subtle influence in the process of educating people, silently infecting the educated The soul, shaping the soul of the educated. The ancients called “words and deeds, ” in the “instruct ” word, is reflected in the teaching of a person outside the teaching of a potential force.