论文部分内容阅读
先秦史籍所载国、鄙组织,以《国语·齐语》最为全面系统,然对其可靠性则多有怀疑者。有的学者认为《齐语》所记管仲辅佐齐桓公称霸的事为战国时人所追叙(王树民:《史部要籍解题》,中华书局1981年版,第14页),其意为《齐语》不尽可信;有的学者则认为《齐语》关于“鄙”的记载“虽不可尽信,总有若干史影存乎其间”(童书业:《春秋左传研究》,上海人民出版社1980年版,第367页)。本人考辨的结果是:《齐语》所记春秋时期齐国国中的民事、军事组织是可靠的;鄙中的民事组织则有可靠的和不完全可靠之别。兹述如
Pre-Qin history books contained in the country, despise organizations to “Mandarin Qi language” the most comprehensive system, however, the reliability of many doubts. Some scholars think that the “Qi language” recorded by Guan Zhong auxiliary Zuo Huan public dominated by the Warring States period is chased by the writers (Wang Shumin: “History of the Department to solve the problem”, Zhonghua Book Company 1981 edition, p. 14), which means “Qi Language ”is not credible; some scholars believe that“ Qi language ”on the“ despicable ”records“ though not enough to believe, there are always some history in between ”(children’s book industry:“ Spring and Autumn Zuo Zhuan Studies ”, Shanghai People’s Publishing 1980 edition, p. 367). As a result of my examination, the civil and military organizations in the Qi State during the Spring and Autumn Periods ascribed by the Qi language are credible; the civic organizations in the middle of nowhere are credible and not completely reliable. As described