论文部分内容阅读
首先对内格尔的经典还原模型和金在权的功能还原模型做了比较,并指出,内格尔模型是在认识论或方法论的层面提出的,而金在权模型是在实践论或本体论的层面提出的;因此,这两个还原模型不是对立的,而是互补的。接着深入到个别事件的内部结构,对金在权的局部还原理论做出分析和评价,并指出其困境和出路。在金在权的三元有序组的事件结构的基础上提出四元有序组的事件结构,据此对功能意义和功能结构作出区分,进一步揭示了功能整体与其实现者之间的随附性关系。最后强调功能实在论的本体论立场,并借助“实体-偶性”和“原因-结果”这两对先验范畴对功能实在论和随附性概念给以形而上学的说明和辩护。
At first, we compare Negel’s classical reduction model with the functional reduction model of gold right, and point out that the Nagel model is proposed at the epistemology or methodology level, while the golden weight model is based on the theory of practice or ontology ; Therefore, the two reduction models are not opposites but complementary. Then it goes deep into the internal structure of individual events, analyzes and evaluates the theory of partial reduction of gold rights, and points out its predicament and outlet. On the basis of the event structure of the ternary ordered group of gold right, we propose the event structure of the quaternion order group to distinguish between the functional meaning and the functional structure, further revealing the attachment between the whole function and its realization Sexual relations. Finally, it emphasizes the ontological position of functional realism and gives a metaphysical explanation and justification of functional realism and attachment by means of the two “apriority” and “cause-result” .