论文部分内容阅读
【目的】探析共被引分析、耦合分析、内容分析在学术期刊分析中的相关性、相似性和差异性,一方面为期刊研究提供方法依据,另一方面有助于拓展期刊研究的视角。【方法】以17种图书情报学核心期刊为例,利用二次指派程序分析法(Quadratic Assignment Procedure,即QAP法)和社会网络分析法(Social network analysis,即SNA法),在Ucinet6.0环境下对三种期刊分析方法进行了相关性分析、网络密度分析、块模型分析和核心-边缘结构分析。【结果】结果显示,三种分析方法在学术期刊分析中有相似之处也存在差异。其中,内容分析与共被引分析的相似度较高、与耦合分析的相似度较低。【结论】内容分析法可作为共被引分析、耦合分析的辅助分析方法,以实现优势互补,提高学术期刊分析的完整性和有效性。
【Objective】 To explore the relevance, similarity and difference of citation analysis, coupling analysis and content analysis in academic journal analysis, on the one hand to provide method basis for periodical research and on the other hand to broaden the perspective of journal research. 【Method】 With 17 core journals of library and information science as an example, we use Quadratic Assignment Procedure (QAP) and Social Network Analysis (SNA) The correlation analysis, network density analysis, block model analysis and core-edge structure analysis of the three journal analysis methods were carried out. 【Result】 The results show that there are similarities and differences between the three methods in academic journals analysis. Among them, the similarity between content analysis and co-citation analysis is high, and the similarity between analysis and co-analysis is low. 【Conclusion】 Content analysis method can be used as auxiliary analysis method of co-citation analysis and coupled analysis in order to complement each other’s advantages and improve the integrity and validity of academic journal analysis.