论文部分内容阅读
编者按WTO“中国-原材料案”和“中国-稀土案”引起了国内外法学界对于入世议定书的法律性质和效力,特别是其与WTO多边协定之间关系的深入思考和广泛讨论。与传统条约法下加入条约基本上是一个程序性问题、不涉及条约实体内容不同,入世议定书为新加入成员创设了与WTO多边协定的既有规则不尽吻合的权利和义务。应当如何理解这些权利和义务,或者更确切地说,如何理解创设这些权利和义务的入世议定书相关条款?
Editor’s note WTO / “China - raw material case” and “China - Rare Earth Case” have aroused the domestic and foreign jurisprudence of the legal nature and effectiveness of the accession protocol, in particular its in-depth thinking and extensive relationship with the multilateral agreements of the WTO discuss. Compared with the traditional treaty law, the accession to a treaty is basically a procedural issue and does not involve any difference in the content of the treaty entity. The accession protocol creates rights and obligations for new members to be inconsistent with the established rules of the multilateral agreement in the WTO. How should these rights and obligations be understood or, more specifically, how to understand the relevant provisions of the accession protocol that created these rights and obligations?