论文部分内容阅读
近年来,测谎技术在我国司法实践中的运用逐渐增多,但对测谎结论能否进入刑事诉讼程序及其证据种类,仍有争议。从证据的关联性、客观性、合法性看,测谎结论具有证据能力,是鉴定结论的一种。但鉴于目前我国相应技术、人员的不规范,现阶段还不能将其纳入诉讼、作为刑事诉讼中的证据。只有当相关问题得到基本解决以后,测谎结论进入诉讼程序才能真正实现其价值,测谎技术才能在保障公民合法权益的同时,自身也得到发展。
In recent years, the application of polygraph technology in our judicial practice has been gradually increasing. However, it remains controversial whether polygraph conclusions can enter the criminal procedure and the types of evidences. Judging from the relevance, objectivity and legitimacy of the evidence, the polygraph conclusion has the evidence ability and is a kind of identification conclusion. However, due to the current non-standardization of relevant technologies and personnel in our country, it can not be brought into litigation at this stage as evidence in criminal proceedings. Only when the related problems are basically solved, can the polygraph technology enter its legal proceedings to realize its value, and the polygraph technology can develop itself while protecting the legitimate rights and interests of citizens.