欧洲人权法院认为,对质诘问的目的是为了保障被告人的防御权以实现公正审判,其基本内涵为刑事被告人在程序中应享有面对面地、全方位地挑战及质问不利证人的适当机会。如果符合义务规则、归责规则、防御规则和补强规则的例外,证人在审判外的证言也可不经法庭质问而被作为裁判的事实依据。欧洲人权法院的观点对我国进一步完善符合国际公约的质问规则具有很大的启发性。 According to the European Court of Human Rights, the purpose of confiscation is to guarantee defendants the right of defense to achieve fair trial. The basic connotation is that criminal defendants should have the proper opportunity to challenge and challenge adverse witnesses face-to-face and omnidirectional in the proceedings. Exceptions to the rule of obligation, imputation rules, defense rules and reinforcement rules, witness testimony outside the trial may also be relied on as factual basis for the refusal without court challenge. The view of the European Court of Human Rights is of great enlightenment for further improvement of the questioning rules in line with international covenants in our country.