论文部分内容阅读
中国的著作权集体管理制度如同中国的著作权法律制度一样,起步较晚,比西方发达国家晚了近一百五十年。西方国家的著作权集体管理制度在百余年的发展中已经获得著作权人和使用者很大的认可,相比之下我国的著作权集体管理制度,在立法层面以及实际运作层面,还存在许多质疑的声音,比如集体管理组织的垄断性、半行政化,管理理念的落后,管理制度的缺失等等问题。著作权法送审稿中,增加了一些规定,更是引发了广泛的关注和讨论。本文将从我国著作权集体管理制度的现状出发,讨论其滥用市场垄断地位的问题,期待该项制度能得到更好的发展。
China’s copyright collective management system, like China’s copyright law system, started later than in developed countries nearly 150 years later. The system of collective management of copyright in western countries has gained great recognition from copyright owners and users in the development of more than 100 years. In contrast, there are still many questions in the legislative and practical aspects of copyright collective management in our country Voices, such as the monopolistic and semi-administrative nature of collective management organizations, the backwardness of management concepts, the absence of management systems, and so on. In the draft of the Copyright Law, some provisions were added, which aroused widespread concern and discussion. This article will proceed from the status quo of the collective management system of copyright in our country to discuss its abuse of market monopoly status and look forward to the system to be able to get better development.