克里普克否认一切先验知识都是必然的传统主张,认为先验、后验是认识论概念,必然和偶然是形而上学概念,因此存在先验偶然命题。本文主要在批判与继承西方哲学传统的基础上讨论克里普克的先验偶然命题,以期深化对其的理解。 Kripke denied that all prior knowledge is inevitable traditional proposition, that transcendental, posterior is the concept of epistemology, necessity and chance are metaphysical concepts, so there is a priori occasional proposition. This article discusses Kripke’s transcendental propositions mainly on the basis of criticizing and inheriting the traditions of Western philosophy in order to deepen their understanding.