关于写作,人们有两种迥异的看法:一种是神圣化,持这种观点的人认为写作需要潜心对待,慎之又慎;而另一种观点则认为写作应该自由化,主张把写作看得日常一些,平淡一些,随心所欲一些。这是我从李燕玲老师《写作教学不妨“去神圣化”》一文中看到的。李老师从写作的本质和意义方面论证并分析后认为:理想的作文教学,应该真正把写作当作一种生命运动,当作思想的实践和走向智慧的活动。李老师的这种观点不能算是振聋发聩,事实上,倡导写作教学应该令学生回归到自由状态的“自由化写作”已经得到了大部分人的认同。对于写作的本质,学界也基本上有了共同的认识,那就是:写作应该是一个活 There are two very different opinions about writing: one is sacredness, and those who hold it think that writing requires great concentration and cautiousness; and another view is that writing should be liberalized and advocated writing as Some day-to-day, plain, freewheeling. This is what I saw from Li Yanling’s teacher “Teaching Writing”. Li argued and analyzed from the aspects of the nature and significance of writing that: The ideal writing teaching should treat writing as a kind of life movement, as the practice of thought and the activity of going to wisdom. This view of Teacher Li can not be regarded as deafening. In fact, “liberal writing”, which advocates that writing teaching should return students to a free state, has been accepted by most people. For the nature of writing, the academic community basically has a common understanding, that is: writing should be a living