论文部分内容阅读
现有的西方主流法治指数在测量规模、法治概念化、测量手段、数据聚合以及相关分析等方面均存在显著的不同,这些不同之处导致了法治指数评估形式的差异。虽然西方法治指数研究已经取得了比较丰硕的成果,但是这些法治指数仍然在法治概念化、数据来源、数据编码以及数据聚合过程等方面存在缺陷,这使其对同一个国家的法治测评难以得出相近的测量结果。因此,在构建和使用法治测量指数时,学者们必须采取一些预防措施来避免出现上述弊端。
The existing mainstream Western rule of law index has significant differences in measurement scale, conceptualization of the rule of law, measurement methods, data aggregation and correlation analysis. These differences lead to the differences in the forms of evaluation of rule of law index. Although the research on western rule of law index has made some fruitful achievements, these rule of law indicators are still deficient in the conceptualization of the rule of law, data sources, data coding and data aggregation processes, which make it difficult to draw similar conclusions about the rule of law in the same country The measurement results. Therefore, scholars must take some precautions to avoid the above disadvantages when constructing and using the rule of law measurement index.