论文部分内容阅读
对中国裁判文书说理问题的研究一直是我国法学界所热切关注的重点,对其研究总量和热情也呈逐年上升的态势。近两年来,学界对我国裁判文书说理问题的研究在取得丰硕成果的同时,也暴露出一些问题:理论研究与实践探讨有待深入、“冷”与“热”不均的现象明显、重复研究的成果较多。因此,理论研究与实务探讨并存、均衡发展和开辟新视角应成为我国裁判文书说理问题研究的发展方向。
The research on the reasoning of China’s referenda has always been the focus of attention of our country’s jurisprudence. The total amount and enthusiasm for its research have also been increasing year by year. In the past two years, while scholars have made fruitful achievements in the study of the adjudicative documents in our country, some problems have also been revealed in the academic circles. Studies in theory and practice need to be further deepened, and the phenomena of unevenness between “cold” and “hot” are obvious , Repeated research more results. Therefore, the coexistence of theoretical research and substantive exploration, the balanced development and the opening up of new perspectives should be the development direction of the research on the rationale of the judgment instruments in our country.