论文部分内容阅读
本刊几年来就汉语辞书编纂的理论和方法发表了大量文章,同时也陆续介绍了一些国外有关辞书编纂的理论、方法和动态,但是,将两部或两部以上的辞书从宏观、微观,纵向、横向,共时、历时等角度进行比较研究的文章还不多见。有鉴于此,本期特发表上海外国语学院青年教师杨金华同志的这篇文章。为了有利于扩大视野,把我国辞书编纂的理论水平和实践水平提高一步,我们希望有更多的同志进行这方面的比较研究,无论是某类辞书(如同义词词典、反义词词典、成语词典等),还是某部有影响的辞书(如《不列颠百科全书》与《中国大百科全书》等),或是某两部辞书中的某个专题(如收词、释义、书证、标注甚或编排、插图等),都可在比较研究之列。科学的比较和深入的研究,必将会促进我国辞书事业的发展。
In the past few years, I published a large number of articles on the theories and methods of Chinese dictionaries, and also introduced some theories, methods and developments about dictionaries in foreign countries one after another. However, I have analyzed two or more dictionaries from macro, micro, Longitudinal, horizontal, total, diachronic perspective comparative study of the article is rare. In view of this, this issue is specially published in this article by Comrade Yang Jinhua, a young teacher at Shanghai International Studies University. In order to help expand our horizons and improve the theoretical and practical level of our dictionaries, we hope that more comrades will conduct comparative studies in this respect, no matter if they are certain dictionaries (such as synonyms, antonyms, dictionaries, etc.) , Or some influential dictionaries (such as Britannica and Encyclopedia of China, etc.), or a topic in one of two dictionaries (such as collection of words, paraphrase, documentary evidence, labeling or even arrangement, illustrations Etc.), can be compared in the column. Comparison of science and in-depth research will surely promote the development of Chinese dictionaries.