论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨胃镜检查相对于上消化道钡餐造影对急性出血性胃炎诊断价值。方法选取2011年1月~2013年2月期间在我院检查并治疗的100例急性出血性胃炎患者,随机将其分成造影组和胃镜组,每组患者50例,其中造影组患者采用上消化道钡餐造影检查诊断,胃镜组患者采用胃镜检查诊断。对比分析两种检查方法的诊断准确率。结果胃镜组诊断准确率为98%,造影组诊断准确率为82%,胃镜组诊断准确率明显高于造影组,两组患者数据比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论相较于造影检查,胃镜检查更具直观性、准确性,而且在检查时能兼顾治疗,给医师的治疗提供更大的优势,值得优先推广使用。
Objective To investigate the diagnostic value of gastroscopy versus upper gastrointestinal barium meal in acute hemorrhagic gastritis. Methods A total of 100 patients with acute hemorrhagic gastritis who were examined and treated in our hospital from January 2011 to February 2013 were randomly divided into radiography group and gastroscopy group, 50 patients in each group. The patients in contrast group were treated with upper digestion Road barium meal angiography diagnosis, endoscopy group of patients diagnosed by gastroscopy. Compare the diagnostic accuracy of the two methods. Results The diagnostic accuracy rate of gastroscopy group was 98%, that of contrast group was 82%, and the diagnostic accuracy of gastroscopy group was significantly higher than that of contrast group. There was significant difference between the two groups (P <0.05). Conclusion Compared with angiography, gastroscopy is more intuitive and accurate, and can take care of the examination at the time of examination to provide greater advantages to the physician’s treatment, which is worthy of giving priority to popularization and use.