论文部分内容阅读
经济史研究一直是历史研究的重要组成部分;而经济史作为经济学中的一个二级学科,其地位却被严重忽视。在经济学或史学期刊上发表的经济史论文,基本遵循本专业的研究范式。从事经济史研究的经济学者,多在中青年时期发表其代表性成果;而史学学者的学术高峰期则相对较晚。经济学界多采用合作的形式开展经济史研究,并以国际学术前沿发展或热点为其导向;史学学者往往遵循史学传统,关注中国经济史本土化问题。经济学视角下的经济史研究,研究对象聚焦在经济类目,样本空间大、时间跨度短;史学则相反。经济史论文的学科间引用率,表明史学对经济学的影响更强。经济理论和定量方法作为一种分析工具,在经济史研究中已被史学和经济学者广泛运用,但史学学者仍然保留着考据的传统。
The study of economic history has always been an important part of historical research. However, economic history, as a secondary subject in economics, has been seriously neglected. The economic history essays published in economics or periodical journals basically follow the research paradigm of this major. Economists engaged in the study of economic history mostly publish their representative achievements in middle-aged and young age, while historians have a relatively academic peak. Economists mostly use the form of cooperation to carry out economic history research, and to the international academic frontier development or hot-headed for its orientation; historians tend to follow the tradition of history, attention to China’s economic history localization. Economic studies from the perspective of economics, the research object focuses on the economic categories, sample space, short time span; historiography is the opposite. Interdisciplinary reference rates in economic history essays indicate that historiography has a stronger impact on economics. As an analytical tool, economic theory and quantitative methods have been widely used by historians and economists in the study of economic history, but historians still retain the tradition of test.