８０年代提出和倡导”编辑学者化”有其一定的针对性，也有一定的积极意义。然而，我们只要认真研究分析，不难发现，这一口号本身及其在出版实践中也存在着明显的缺失。第一，“编辑学者化”口号与社会主义市场经济条件下出版事业变革实践不相适应。作为出版主体的编辑，除了 In the 1980s, it was pointed out and advocated that “editorial scholarization” had its own pertinence and certain positive significance. However, as long as we carefully study and analyze it, we can easily find out that this slogan itself and its obvious omission in publishing practice also exist. First, the slogan of “editing scholarship” is incompatible with the practice of publishing business reform under the conditions of a socialist market economy. As editor of the publishing body, except