论文部分内容阅读
不可分之债在优士丁尼法中略现雏形,但相对零碎和粗糙;杜摩林提出不可分的两种分类法使问题更加复杂化和混乱化;波蒂埃继承修正了杜摩林的一种分类法,并提出了“债的标的为物和行为”以及“物理分割和观念分割”的理论;而萨维尼却提出“债的标的为给付”的观点,并为温德沙伊德采纳;弗雷塔斯接受了萨维尼的观点,以债的标的(给付)是否可分作为债之可分与否的唯一标准,并抛弃了“观念分割”的方式;萨尔斯菲尔德完全接受弗雷塔斯的设计并完善之,最终设计出体系上和内容上都相对完善的不可分之债制度;我国未来民法典在不可分之偾的设计上应采《阿根廷民法典》的模式,即应以“债的标的”为标准将债分为可分之债和不可分之债,以“债的主体”为标准将债分为按份之债和连带之债。
The inseparable bonds were slightly rudimentary in the Faustinei method, but they were relatively fragmented and rough; the two classification methods that Tuoluolin made indivisible were complicated and chaotic; and Portier inherited and revised a Taxonomy “and put forward the theory of” subject matter and behavior of debt “and” physical segmentation and concept segmentation “, while Savigny put forward the idea that” the subject of debt is payment “ Deshaid adopted; Freitas accepted Savigny’s point of view, whether the subject matter of the debt can be divided as the only criterion for the demarcation of the debt or not, and abandoned the ”concept of division“ approach; Sarsfield fully accepted the design and improvement of Freitas, and eventually devised a system that is relatively perfect in terms of both the system and the content. The future civil code in China should be adopted in the design of the ”Civil Code of Argentina “Model, which should be” the subject of the debt “as the standard dividends into separable bonds and inseparable bonds to” the main body of the debt, "as the standard debt is divided into shares of debt and associated debt.