论文部分内容阅读
通过比勘《文宗阁〈四库全书〉装函清册》与其他各阁书目及《四库全书总目》《四库全书简明目录》中书籍名称及类目排序的差别,可以判断《装函清册》并非伪作,并从《装函清册》著录的书籍、避讳和补函情况推测抄写于嘉庆时期。作为文宗阁《四库全书》的劫余之物,该清册具有极高的史料价值,将其与陈垣抄录的文津阁书籍函数进行比勘,发现两阁在书籍装函、合函等方面存在差异,可进行比较研究。
By comparing the difference between the names of books and the sorts of titles in the catalogs of “Letter from the Manchu Court, Sikuquanshu,” and other books of the various tribes and the “Si Ku Quan Shu Mu Quan,” “Si Ku Quan Shu Concise Catalog,” we can judge that " The book is not a fake, and is presumed copied from the books, taboo and supplementary letters contained in the Letters of Enrichment in the Jiaqing Period. As a remnant of the Sikuquanshu of Wenzong Pavilion, this volume has a very high historical value. Compared with Wenjin Pavilion book functions copied by Chen Yuan, There are differences, can be comparative study.