论文部分内容阅读
“实事求是”源于明清经学中的考据学方法。毛泽东同志借之用以概括辩证唯物主义的精髓。此后,实事求是更成为了中国共产党的思想路线。中国化的马克思主义认为,“实事求是”包含着唯物论、认识论、辩证法和方法论的丰富含义。本文考察宋元明清学术史后,认为,应以“理事关系论”诠释实事求是。理事关系中的“即事求理”、“理在事中”构成了“实事求是”的本体论含义。而且,理在事中比“气生理”更符合马克思主义的真理观。进而,本文设想以“理在事中”深化实事求是和马克思主义中国化,直达中国哲学讨论理事关系的论域。本文同时要辨明“气生理”的理论风险性。
“Seeking Truth from Facts ” from the textual research method in the Ming and Qing sutras. Comrade Mao Tse-tung borrowed the essence of dialectical materialism. Since then, seeking truth from facts has become the ideological line of the Chinese Communist Party. Sinolization of Marxism holds that “seeking truth from facts ” contains the rich meanings of materialism, epistemology, dialectics and methodology. After examining the academic history of Song, Yuan, Ming and Qing Dynasties, this paper argues that we should interpret the theory of “seeking truth from facts” with the “theory of the relationship between the directors”. The relationship between the directors and the “things that seek truth”, “what is the matter” constitutes the “truth” “ontology. Moreover, the reason is more consistent with the truth of truth of Marxism than that of ”Qi and Physiology“. In addition, this article attempts to deepen the theory of ”seeking truth from facts“ and ”Marxism in China“ in order to direct the Chinese philosophy and discuss the relationship between the directors. This article at the same time to identify ”Qi and Physiology " theoretical risk.