如何区别前见与立场的本质差异,明确前见与立场的不同功能,由此判断阐释路线及其结果是否确当与合法,是阐释学必须解决的重大问题。通过对经典阐释学著作相关论断的细读与分析,有如下结论:前见是潜在的、非自主决定的,立场是显露的、自主选择的;前见是非自觉的、下意识的,立场是自觉的、主动站位的。前见作为一切认知的前提和基准,先天存在于阐释者的意识之中,是阐释者本人无法改变的。否定前见、忽视前见,不符合认识发生及成长的基本规律。立场作为立足点和出发点,作为态度和判断,作为理论和观点,不是随意的见解或感受,而是相对稳定持久的自觉认识。立场决定理解,立场规整思想,放弃立场同样是一种立场自觉。前见不可避免,立场很难规避。一切从实际出发,从事物本身出发,实事求是地展开认识和阐释,是阐释学的基本立足点和出发点。 How to distinguish the essential difference between foregone and standpoint and to clarify the different functions of foresight and standpoint so as to determine whether the interpretation of the course and its result are correct and proper are major issues that must be solved in hermeneutics. Through the careful reading and analysis of the relevant conclusions of the classic hermeneutics, the following conclusions can be drawn: Pre-foresight is latent and involuntary; position is revealed and autonomously selected; foresight is unconscious and subconscious; The active station. As a premise and reference for all cognition, pre-existence is inherent in the interpreter’s consciousness and can not be changed by the interpreter himself. Negating foreseen, ignoring foresight, does not meet the basic law of occurrence and growth. Position as a starting point and starting point, as the attitude and judgments, as the theory and point of view, not casual views or feelings, but relatively stable and lasting self-awareness. It is also a self-aware position to understand and take the position of a regular position and to give up its position. Seeing before is unavoidable, position is hard to avoid. Starting from reality, starting from things themselves and seeking truth from facts, everything is the basic starting point and the starting point of hermeneutics.