论文部分内容阅读
三段论作为逻辑推理,是司法裁判方法的最基本方法。司法裁判通过三段论逻辑推理,得出符合该法律规范旨意的裁判结论。三段论逻辑推理本义而言,最核心的问题是作为逻辑推理的大前提是否完备,只有大前提正确的情况下,大前提与小前提的涵摄关系,结论的推理才能进行,大前提的真伪是三段论得以成立的基础,也是司法裁判正确的前提。由于在司法实践中构建完备法律规范体系的努力始终没有成功,所以法官裁判案件的过程,其实质是在浩如烟海的法律、法规、习惯中发现、分析和创造一个又一个司法三段论大前提的过程。
Syllogism as a logical reasoning is the most basic method of judicial adjudication. Judicial referees use the logic of syllogism to infer the conclusion of the referees in line with the purpose of the law. Syllogism logical reasoning in terms of the original meaning, the core issue is whether the premise of logical reasoning is complete, only if the premise is correct, the premise and the premise of culvert relationship, the conclusions of reasoning can proceed, the premise of the authenticity It is the basis for the establishment of syllogism and the correct premise of judicial adjudication. Since the efforts to build a complete system of legal norms in judicial practice have always been unsuccessful, the process of judges’ adjudication of cases is essentially the process of discovering, analyzing and creating one after another the premise of judicial syllogism in the vast laws, regulations and customs.