当前,持续深入的房地产调控政策除了积极的效果之外,这轮政策也存在着行政化倾向、重需求而轻供给等问题。当寄希望于在短期内予以解决房地产长期存在的问题时,势必要更多地依靠行政性的手段。比如,本轮调控政策中争议颇大的“限购令”:一是限购不能真正发挥调节供求失衡的关系;二是地方政府限制外地人购房的在打击投机的同时误伤真实需求;三是行政手段执行过度的可能后果。行政手段的效益通常比较差,而且非常难把握力度,不是实施不力就是执行过度,这样容易造成经济与市场的大起大落。 At present, in addition to the positive effects of the ongoing real estate regulation and control policies, this round of policies also poses the problems of administrative tendency, heavy demand and light supply. It is bound to rely more on administrative measures when placing the hope of resolving the long-standing real estate problems in a short period of time. For example, the controversy in the current round of regulatory policies “restriction order ”: First, the purchase can not really play to regulate the relationship between supply and demand imbalance; second, local governments limit the purchase of foreigners in the fight against speculation at the same time accidental injury real needs; Third The possible consequences of excessive implementation of administrative measures. The effectiveness of administrative measures is usually poor, and very difficult to grasp the intensity, either imprudent or over-implementation, so easily lead to the ups and downs of the economy and the market.