论文部分内容阅读
在写本时代,合会经注文与疏文,除了以十三经注疏合刻为代表之连缀模式外,还出现过另外两套方案:简单平列的两栏模式基本没有流行,打散模式尽管水乳交融,却存在破坏单疏结构的风险。本文重点探讨了以日传钞本《论语义疏》为代表之打散模式的优缺点,并提出了改进的构想。《唐律疏议》可能从来就没有单疏,这提示我们打散模式也可能是单疏之出文直接标举经注全文而非其起讫的结果。文章最后讨论了合会注疏时保持经注疏文之层次区别的几种手段——提行低格/小字不提行、朱墨笔,以及文字标识。
In this era of writing, co-scriptures and open-text, in addition to the thirteen by the carved as the representative of the injection mode, there have been two other programs: simple flat two-column mode is basically not popular, break the mode despite Water and milk blend, but there is the risk of disrupting single sparse structure. This article focuses on the advantages and disadvantages of the break-up pattern typified by Japanese-language banknote “The Theory of Meaning and Meaning” and puts forward the concept of improvement. “Tang law” may never have a single sparse, suggesting that we break up the model may also be single sparse out of the direct quotation by the whole note rather than its starting and ending results. At the end of the article, I discuss several ways to keep the difference between the levels of annotations at the time of co-annotation, that is, to introduce the lower / lower case, lower case, the lower case and the logo.