论文部分内容阅读
指出在人文社会科学研究领域,对学术文献著者学术成就的评价多以发文的数量为主,而对文献的质量评价没有一定标准,提出考察文献著者群的数量指标和质量指标相结合的评价体系,论述被引量作为质量指标的特殊作用,介绍“标准化”计量方法的含义和计算过程,并以“数字图书馆”专题文献为例,对103位核心著者进行评价排序,筛选出15位最有影响力的著者。
It points out that in the field of humanities and social sciences, the academic achievements of academic authors are mostly based on the number of published papers, while there is no standard on the quality evaluation of the academic documents. The evaluation system combining the quantity index and the quality index of the surveyed literature authors is proposed , Discusses the special function of quoted quantity as quality index, introduces the meaning and calculation process of “standardization” measurement method, and uses “digital library” thematic literature as an example to sort and rank 103 core writers, Influential author.