论文部分内容阅读
档案馆编研机构的设立和编研工作的开展,标志着我国档案馆工作的进一步发展。但是,由于一些同志对编研工作的性质和现状不甚了解,因而产生了一些片面的看法。 刘文杰先生认为:档案馆设立编研机构,“大量利用本馆馆藏历史档案进行历史研究,撰写历史论著”,从而“忽略了档案工作的目的,模糊了利用工作方向,不利于历史档案开放方针的贯彻执行”。他所举编研工作的三大弊端:其一,“带有一定普遍性”的,“通过查找信息的封锁从而形成对珍贵档案史料进行人为的垄断”;其二,“高层次研究人才大多流往被认为容易‘出成果’的编研部门搞历史研究”,而“不利于档案馆的业务建设”;其三,“致使档案馆同学术界（尤其是史学界）之间形成无法解决的矛盾”,并断言:编研机构的存在是“妨碍档案开放的亟待解决的问题”,进而呼吁:“一定不能提倡档案工作者搞历史研究”。
The establishment of compiling and editing institutes of archives and the development of compilation and research work mark the further development of the work of archives in our country. However, since some comrades did not fully understand the nature and current status of the compilation and research work, some unilateral views have emerged. Mr. Liu Wenjie thinks: Archives set up a research institute, “making extensive use of the museum’s historical archives for historical research and writing historical treatises”, thus “neglecting the purpose of archival work and obscuring the use of the work direction and the unfavorable policy of opening up historical archives execute thouroughly”. The three major drawbacks of his research work are: first, “with a certain degree of universality,” and “create an artificial monopoly on the precious archives and historical materials by looking for the blockade of information”; secondly, “most of the high-level research personnel To conduct historical research into the research and development departments that are deemed to be easy to ’get fruit’ ”and“ not conducive to the business construction of the archives ”; thirdly,“ the unresolved problems between the archives and the academic circles (especially historians) Contradictions, ”and asserted that the existence of a research institute is“ a problem to be solved that hinders the opening up of archives ”and further called for“ the historical work of archivists must not be promoted. ”