论文部分内容阅读
目的比较多数牙缺失患者行固定种植义齿和可摘局部义齿、传统固定义齿修复后的主观感受。方法对58例戴用可摘局部义齿后又行固定种植义齿修复的患者及58例传统双端固定义齿患者,采用自拟的问卷调查表,由患者本人就诊时填写后进行统计对照分析。结果种植固定义齿与可摘局部义齿在咀嚼功能、美观程度、方便程度、语言功能方面有统计学差异(P<0.05);在固位功能、舒适性方面等方面存在显著性差异(P<0.01);种植固定义齿与传统固定义齿在咀嚼功能、美观程度、固定功能、舒适性、方便性、语音功能之间满意度的差别无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论多数牙缺失患者行桥式固定种植义齿,较可摘局部义齿修复能更好地满足患者需求,获得高质量的义齿,是传统固定义齿修复的重要补充。
Objective To compare the subjective perceptions of prosthetic dentures and removable partial dentures in the majority of patients with missing teeth and traditional fixed dentures. Methods Fifty-eight patients with fixed partial denture and 58 patients with traditional double-denture denture were enrolled in this study. The patients were asked to fill in their questionnaires after questionnaire, and then perform statistical analysis. Results There was a significant difference in masticatory function, aesthetics, convenience and language function between implant denture and removable partial denture (P <0.05). There was significant difference in retention function and comfort (P <0.01) ). There was no significant difference in the satisfaction of mastication function, aesthetics, fixation function, comfort, convenience and speech function between the fixed denture and the traditional fixed denture (P> 0.05). Conclusion The majority of patients with missing teeth of bridge-type implant dentures, removable partial denture repair can better meet the needs of patients, access to high-quality dentures, is an important complement to the traditional fixed dentures.