论文部分内容阅读
学界对《合同法》第52条第5项“强制性规定”的称谓存在颇多争论。对于“强制性规定”与“强行性规定”这两个概念不作区分或许会减少很多麻烦,但前者与“禁止性规定”还是有必要区分应用。“效力性强制性规定”的认定标准是合理适用第5项的关键,有必要结合案情与社会公共利益来综合评判所涉法律法规的性质,进而确定合同效力。
The academic circles have a lot of controversies over the title of Article 52 (5) “Mandatory Provisions ” in the Contract Law. It may be less cumbersome to distinguish between the two concepts “mandatory” and “mandatory”, but it is still necessary to distinguish between the former and the “prohibition”. “The validity of the mandatory provisions” is the key to the reasonable application of the first 5, it is necessary to combine the case and the public interest to comprehensively assess the nature of the laws and regulations involved, and then determine the effectiveness of the contract.