论文部分内容阅读
概念的泛用与缺少诗艺谱系的回溯比较是目前关于韩愈“以文为诗”的研究中存在的两个重要问题。如果还原此概念内涵的建构过程会发现混淆评介宋人与韩愈“以文为诗”的话语拥有悠久的传统,“以议论为诗”即是一个在这种历史语境中“被发明”出的维度。以散句入诗的艺术手段代有传之,具体程式上则有着显豁的区别,考察韩愈采取何种模式创作杂言有助于揭橥其独特的书写策略与匠心,为沉湎于抽绎特点——对应举证式的研究提供被淹没的环节。
The retrospective comparison between the concept of general use and the lack of poetic pedigree is the two important issues in the research of Han Yu If we reconstruct the connotation construction of this concept, we will find that we have a long tradition of confusing and commenting on the Song and Han Yu’s “poems of poetry”, “to talk about poems” “Invented” out of the dimension. The art of taking scattered sentences into poetry has its origin on the generation, and the specific procedure has obvious differences. It is helpful to reveal the unique writing strategies and ingenuity that Han Yu adopts to create his own patterns. Features - Corresponding to evidence-based research provides submerged links.