论文部分内容阅读
近些年,隐性采访在我国诸多媒体被广泛应用,为法制新闻报道增色不少。隐性采访隐蔽性强,采访环境相对开放,无疑弥补了公开采访的诸多缺陷。但我国目前尚未出台《新闻法》,现有法律法规也无关于隐性采访的专门条文,因而对其界定始终模糊不清。加之部分记者使用隐性采访不当,新闻侵权案件屡屡发生,对社会造成了不良影响。本文旨在探究新环境下法制新闻隐性采访报道的“法”“理”冲突,为制度架构、媒体运作、记者实践提供参考。
In recent years, implicit interviews have been widely used in many media outlets in our country, adding a lot to the coverage of the legal news. Hidden concealment of hidden interviews, interview environment is relatively open, undoubtedly make up for the many shortcomings of public interviews. However, at present, China has not yet promulgated the “Press Law,” and the existing laws and regulations have no specific provisions about implicit interviews, so their definition has always been ambiguous. In addition, some journalists use implicit interviews inappropriately, and news infringement cases occur frequently, which have adversely affected the society. The purpose of this paper is to probe into the conflict between “law” and “reasoning” in the implicit coverage of legal news in the new environment, and to provide reference for institutional structure, media operation and journalistic practice.