论文部分内容阅读
康德的“先天综合判断”命题不仅在知识学中有效,而且也在与人类心智有关的其他领域起作用。这里讨论的民族心智和文化差异,便与康德的这一命题相关,另一方面也与威廉·洪堡关于各种具体语言以及在它们之后隐蔽地发挥作用的共同语言结构的设想有关。其设想后来在乔姆斯基的生成语法中得到发展。这个问题揭示出各种文化与世界观体系的差异性,这里则首先归结为:在作为民族心智和文化差异的各种不同世界观的背后,是否可能存在着一个先天的、为人类社会所共有的普遍世界观体系,它体现出人之为人的最基本要素或共性?
Kant’s proposition of “innate comprehensive judgment” is not only valid in the field of knowledge, but also in other fields related to the human mind. The national mental and cultural differences discussed here are related to Kant’s proposition and, on the other hand, to the wording of William Humboldt’s common language structure in various concrete languages and covertly functioning behind them. The idea was later developed in Chomsky’s grammar. This question reveals the differences between various cultural and world outlook systems. Here, firstly, it is attributed to the possibility that there is a congenial existence common to human beings behind the different worldviews that are ethnic mental and cultural differences World outlook system, it reflects the most basic elements or common people?