论文部分内容阅读
从史学批评的意义上说,《史略》是继唐人刘知V《史通》之后的又一部介绍和品评史学的著作,它补充了《史通》没有论及的唐中叶至宋代的部分史籍和史学现象。《史略》虽为目录之书,但其中包含的史学批评思想亦颇引人注目,这突出地体现在高似孙以前辈的史学理论为武器,把“叙事”和“裁论”作为评价史学著作优劣的两个重要标准,并将其置于对客观历史事实的把握和认定这个前提之下。在史法方面,把史家对史料采撰是否得当、对客观事实和非客观事实的认识与选择是否正确作为考察其历史撰述是否为信史的第一标尺,同时也把它当做衡量史著价值的最重要依据,确立起尚信求真的史学批评意识。高似孙以“义例”作为衡量史书优劣的标准,重视裁论的思想和史学功用。他对史书体裁变化规律的认识、对体裁体例创新动因的分析却是另辟蹊径,首次提出了史赞、史草、史目等史书体裁的分类方法,且对其特点所做出的概括亦有可圈点之处。
From the point of view of historical criticism, “史略略” is the second introduction and the history review of the works after Liu Zhi-V “Shi Tong” of the Tang Dynasty, which supplements the works from the middle of the Tang Dynasty to the Song Dynasty Some historical records and historical phenomenon. Though it is the book of the book of history, “History of the Book of History” is quite compelling in its historical criticism, which is prominently reflected in the historical theory of Sun Yat-sen and the theory of “historical narrative” and “ As the two important criteria for evaluating the merits and demerits of historiography, and put it under the premise of grasping and identifying objective historical facts. In the field of history and law, the historian’s correct understanding of and selection of historical facts and non-objective facts as historical materials is the first measure of whether or not his historical writings are the history of the letter, and at the same time it is used as a measure of historical value The most important basis to establish a letter of truth still true historical criticism. Gao like Sun to ”justice" as a measure of the pros and cons of the standard history, pay attention to the thought of cutting and historiography. His understanding of the changing rules of history books and his analysis of the motivation for the creation of genres and institutions are another way. He first proposed the classification of history books such as history, history and history, and summarized the characteristics of the history books Circling place.