论文部分内容阅读
在二十世纪楚辞学领域中，最为引人瞩目的学术争议是屈原存在问题的讨论。屈原否定论最早由廖季平提出，从而引发了漫延近一个世纪的、一大批中日学者卷入其间的旷日持久的争论，参与者甚至包括了现当代一些著名学者，如胡适、闻一多、郭沫若、何天行、卫聚贤、朱东润、稻耕一郎、铃木修次、三泽玲尔、冈村繁、白川静、黄中模、浅野通有等等。这种争鸣不仅不会掩盖历史真实存在，相反更会从正反两方面澄清历史重重雾障，越来越清晰地显示一个本源性的屈原形象，这对楚辞学的深入发展都具有相当重要的价值意义。
The most controversial academic controversy in the field of twentieth Century Chu speech is the discussion of Qu Yuan’s existing problems. Qu Yuan’s theory of negation was first put forward by Liao Jiping. As a result, protracted controversies involving a large number of Chinese and Japanese scholars, including some famous scholars such as Hu Shi, Wen Yiduo, Guo Moruo, He Tianxing, Wei Ju Xian, Zhu Dongrun, rice cultivation Ichiro, Suzuki repair times, three Ze Ling, Okamura Fan, Shirakawa static, yellow mode, Asano and so on. This kind of contention not only does not obscure the true existence of history, on the contrary, it will clarify the historical fog from both positive and negative aspects, and shows more and more clearly an original Quyuan image, which is of great importance to the further development of the study The value of the meaning.