论文部分内容阅读
厘清污染环境与破坏生态的关系是完成我国新修订的《环境保护法》和《侵权责任法》部分对接的基本步骤,也是促进新《环境保护法》实施的基础环节。因此,要实现两者完美对接,首先就需要辨析清“污染环境”与“破坏生态”的关系,对于两者的关系,我赞成其属于不同行为范畴的环境侵权。首先我从“生态环境”一词的不同解释出发,根据不同情况,应分别适用“生态环境”“生态与环境”“生态”“环境”等词的理论更为合理;接着再从两者不同特征出发,从而理顺“污染环境”与“破坏生态”的关系;破坏生态是不同于污染环境的行为范畴,《侵权责任法》中关于“污染环境”的归责原则并不完全适用“破坏生态”的归责原则。
Clarifying that the relationship between environmental pollution and ecological destruction is a basic step in accomplishing the newly revised “Environmental Protection Law” and “Tort Liability Law” part of our country and a basic step in promoting the implementation of the new “Environmental Protection Law.” Therefore, to achieve the perfect connection between the two, we must first distinguish between “pollution of the environment” and “destruction of ecology” relationship, for the relationship between the two, I agree that they belong to different categories of environmental violations. First of all, from the different explanations of the term “ecological environment”, according to different situations, the theories of “ecological environment”, “ecological and environmental”, “ecological” and “environmental” should apply respectively And then from two different characteristics, so as to rationalize the relationship between “pollution of the environment ” and “destruction of ecology ”; destruction of ecology is different from the behavior of polluting the environment, “Tort Liability Act” on “Pollution of the environment ” the principle of attribution does not fully apply “damage ecology ” principle of attribution.