论文部分内容阅读
祖国医学中的“营卫气血”概念有重要意义,在生理,病理,药理以及诊断和治疗中和这些概念都有深切关連,但对于它们的界说和理解,从来就存在着争论。各家自作释说,所见纷纭,使得这些概念更加含糊和模棱。有人是把它们合并成二个概念,如唐容川说:“营者,血也;卫者,气也。血守于内,如兵家之安营,故曰‘营’;气卫于外,如兵家之护卫,故曰‘卫’”(《医经精义》),温病学说的反对者恽铁樵也是如此看法。现代多偏重从功能和物質来探讨,如上海中医学会主编的“藏象学说的理论与应用”中说:“‘营卫’主要体现在功能作用方面,‘气血’主要体现在物質基础方面”。刘弼臣同志则认为:
The concept of “invigorating the qi and blood” in the Chinese medicine is of great significance. These concepts are deeply related to these concepts in physiology, pathology, pharmacology, and diagnosis and treatment. However, there has been controversy over their definition and understanding. Various interpretations of their own opinions and their varied opinions make these concepts more vague and ambiguous. Some people have merged them into two concepts. For example, Tang Rongchuan said: “The camper has blood, the guardian, and the gas. The blood stays inside, such as the army’s camp, so it’s the ’camp’; the gas is outside, like the military. The guards, therefore the “guard” (“Journey of Medicine”), the opponent of the theory of febrile disease Ruan Tiexi also think so. The modern emphasis is on function and substance. For example, in the theory and application of Tibetan elephant theory edited by the Shanghai Society of Traditional Chinese Medicine, “The “Guardian” is mainly reflected in the functional role, and the “blood” is mainly reflected in the material basis. ". Comrade Liu Yuchen thinks: