论文部分内容阅读
我国理论界和实务界之所以会就“间接碰撞”是否属于船舶碰撞这一问题展开长期的激烈争论,在很大程度是因为受到了司法实践和航运实务之间价值追求和利益博弈的深刻影响,集中表现在如何确定“间接碰撞”的法律适用以及船舶保险条款所承保的碰撞责任是否包括“间接碰撞”的情形这两个问题上。因此,在对船舶碰撞概念进行释义时,应当充分考虑与其现实意义之间的相互作用关系。
The reason why China’s theorists and practitioners make long-term heated debates over whether “indirect collision” belongs to the collision of ships is due in large part to the value pursuit and profit-gambling between judicial practice and shipping practice Profound impact, focused on how to determine the “indirect collision” and the application of the law and the claimant clauses covered by the clauses of the insurance clauses cover the case of “indirect collision”. Therefore, in the definition of the concept of collision of ships, the interaction with its realistic meaning should be fully considered.