论文部分内容阅读
从奥古斯丁起,西方主流学界往往依据决定论与自由意志的二元对立架构,主张自由意志的随意任性具有随机偶然的倾向,既有可能鼓励人们行善,也有可能怂恿人们作恶,结果扭曲了自由意志的本来面目。其实,无论从语义分析的角度看,还是从现实生活的角度看,人们的自由意志始终遵循着趋善避恶的人性逻辑。只有抓住了这根一定如此的必然链条,我们才能在元价值学的层面上揭示人们在诸善冲突中如何基于意志自由达成现实自由的内在机制。
From Augustine, the western mainstream scholars often rely on the dichotomy between determinism and free will. They argue that random williness of free will has a tendency of random chance. It may not only encourage people to do good, but also encourage people to do evil. As a result, they distort the free will The true colors. In fact, no matter from the perspective of semantic analysis, or from the perspective of real life, people’s free will always follows the human logic of getting better and evading evil. Only by grasping the certain necessary chain of this root will we be able to reveal at the level of the meta-value theory how people can realize the inherent mechanism of freedom of reality based on freedom of will in the conflicts of goodness.