同样是一件文物,考古工作者与收藏者们的评价往往大相径庭。这大多是由于考古工作者们看重的是这件器物能提供多少历史信息,而收藏界多看重的是其艺术价值和经济价值。因此,常常是大多数考古工作者并不以为然的东西,却能炒出一个天价来。如明清以来的一些瓷器,它们的价格往往能高出一件青铜器的几十倍甚至上百倍!而在20世纪六七十年代,我们在乡下搞文物调查与考古时,一盒香烟就可以换得一方秦汉瓦当!在老百姓的眼里,它毕竟是一块瓦头。平心而论,瓦当与精美的瓷器相比,确实土里土气,有点其貌不扬,但从瓦当的历史、考古价值看,有的完全可以与青铜器相媲美,更不逊色于那些天价的瓷器。现在瓦当的市场价格虽然一路攀升,然而还远未达到收藏历史上其应有的价位…… The same is a cultural relics, archaeologists and collectors tend to evaluate very different. Much of this is due to the value that archaeologists value about how long this artifact can provide historical information, and what the collectors value is its artistic value and economic value. Therefore, it is often something that most archaeologists do not take for granted. For example, some porcelain wares since the Ming and Qing dynasties often cost tens or even hundreds of times more than a bronze ware! In the 1960s and 1970s, when we were investigating and archeological artifacts in the country, a box of cigarettes In exchange for one Qin Qin and Wadang! In the eyes of ordinary people, after all, it is a piece of tile. In all fairness, compared with exquisite porcelain, Vadim really rustic soil, a bit unpleasant, but from the history of Vatan, the archaeological value, and some can be comparable with the bronze, but not inferior to those high price porcelain. Now the market price of Wadang, although climbing all the way, is still far from its desired price in the history of collection.