“60后”作家崛起二十年来,相关评论并不缺乏,但这代作家的思想和小说观念与“50后”作家究竟存在什么差异,支撑这种思想和小说观念的社会思潮、文化语境究竟应该怎样去理解,上述差异性在读者阅读和文学史评价上又牵引出哪些问题,这些都是本文所关心的议题。本文以李洱的《问答录》为具体案例,采用“必须能够进入他整个人之中,以他的眼光来看,以他的感受来感受,以他的准则来评判”这种理解式的研究方式。笔者向来以为,以研究对象所认为的那种方式来理解研究对象,并与他们的历史建立勾连,才能够使问题成为他们的也是研究者能够看清楚的问题。 In the two decades since the rise of writers, there has been no shortage of relevant comments, but what is the difference between this generation of writers ’thoughts and novels’ conceptions and the post-50s writers? The social trend of thought supporting these ideas and novels , How to understand the cultural context should be understood, the above differences in the reader reading and literature history evaluation and lead to what problems, these are the topics of concern to this article. This article takes Li’er’s “Q & A” as a specific case, adopting the understanding that “must be able to enter his whole person, in his eyes, feel in his feelings and judge by his principles ” Style of research. The author has always believed that it is enough to understand the research object in the way that the research object thinks and link it up with their history so that the problem can become the problem that they and the researcher can see clearly.