论文部分内容阅读
《灭种公约》首次将灭绝种族罪规定为一项国际犯罪。公约第二条将灭绝种族罪中被保护的团体限定在“民族”、“族裔”、“种族”和“宗教”这四类团体中,但却没有给出四类团体的明确定义。对于“族裔”团体的定义,国际法庭在裁判中没有采取完全一致的标准,以致于国际社会对“族裔”团体的认识一直模糊不清。综合国内外学者的观点和国际刑事法院的实践,对于“族裔”团体的判断应坚持主客观相结合的标准,在客观上具有相同的文化和语言,在主观上自我认同或被他人认同为团体。
For the first time, the Genocide Convention sets the crime of genocide as an international crime. Article 2 of the Convention defines the groups to be protected in the genocide as being defined in the four categories of “ethnic”, “ethnic”, “ethnic” and “religious” but not Clear definition of the four groups. For the definition of “ethnic” groups, the International Tribunal did not adopt a completely consistent standard in its judgments, so that the international community’s awareness of “ethnic ” groups has been blurred. According to the opinions of domestic and foreign scholars and the practice of ICC, the judgments of “ethnic ” groups should adhere to the standard of combination of subjectivity and objectivity, objectively have the same culture and language, subjectively identify themselves with each other, Identity as a group.