评估2008～2009年的技术进步时,千万不要根据标题判断研究的类别。许多研究领域看起来好像很接近,例如:消防队员的健康和安全、通信、灭火技术以及热成像等,但具体内容(如:范围、可负担性、可达性、新知识含量、应急人员使用及产品的改进)是有差别的。2006年,有人请里诺市(Reno)内华达大学消防学院的迈克尔·索斯里(Michael Southerly)列出10年来应急反应领域中的主要技术进步,但他给出的清单实际上有许多在本文的讨论中属于相同的类别。名列清单之首的是计算机和软件技术。他说:“这两门技术把 When evaluating technological advances from 2008 to 2009, do not judge the type of study by title. Many research areas look very similar, for example: firefighters’ health and safety, communication, fire-fighting techniques and thermal imaging, but the details (eg scope, affordability, accessibility, new knowledge, And product improvements) are different. In 2006, Michael Southerly at the University of Nevada’s School of Fire at Reno listed the major technological advances in emergency response over the past 10 years, but the list he actually presented was actually many in this article The discussion belongs to the same category. The top of the list is computer and software technology. He said: ”These two technologies to put