论文部分内容阅读
从世界范围看,小额诉讼设立的价值和目标应当是保障公民“接近正义(Access to Justice)”的机会平等,而不是将案件分流作为主要目的。本文将从“接近正义”的角度,运用实证分析法,具体论述:小额诉讼沦为大企业、大公司的追债工具(接近了谁的正义)、程序选择权的限缩(程序正义)、判决异议权的缺失(实体正义)这三大小额诉讼制度中亟待解决的问题,并对于我国小额诉讼的改进提出一定的建议。
Judging from the perspective of the world, the value and the goal of setting up a small-sum litigation should be to ensure equality of opportunity for citizens and “access to justice” rather than to divert cases as their primary objective. This article will use the empirical analysis method from the perspective of “Close to Justice ”, specifically discussing: the small-sum litigation has become the debt collection tool of large enterprises and large companies (which is close to the justice), the restriction of the choice of procedure Justice), and the absence of right of objection (substantive justice), which are urgent problems to be solved. And some suggestions are put forward for the improvement of our country’s small lawsuit.