论文部分内容阅读
基于无罪推定原则,国家不应该在宣布公民有罪之前羁押公民,但是,由于国家理性的限制,公民对于刑事纠纷的解决具有配合义务。这一义务的承担不是针对任意一个公民。追诉事实的可能性条件的功能就在于将负有特定配合义务的公民与其他一般公民区别开来。同时,诉讼风险决定了国家不能不惜一切代价追诉轻重不同的犯罪,追诉犯罪的严重性条件的功能就是在成本代价和惩罚犯罪的功利追求之间予以平衡。逮捕措施是程序性而非惩罚性措施,诉讼保障的必要性条件就在于准确体现逮捕措施的性质,从而具体实现逮捕措施的节约化。新一轮的立法修改,应该从上述三方面科学设计逮捕制度的实质条件,以实现羁押状态下等候审判是例外的通行原则。
Based on the principle of presumption of innocence, the state should not hold citizens before declaring citizens guilty. However, due to the limitation of state rationality, citizens have an obligation to cooperate in resolving criminal disputes. This obligation is not borne by any one citizen. The possibility of prosecuting facts The function of the conditions lies in distinguishing citizens who have a specific obligation of co-operation from other ordinary citizens. At the same time, the risk of litigation determines that the state can not prosecute crimes of different severity at any cost. The function of prosecuting the severity of crime is to strike a balance between the cost and the pursuit of utilitarian punishment of crime. Arrests are procedural rather than punitive measures. The necessary condition for the protection of litigation lies in accurately reflecting the nature of the arrests and thus saving the arrests. The new round of legislative changes should be based on the above three aspects of the scientific design of the substantive conditions of the arrest system in order to achieve the custody of awaiting trial is an exception to the principle of passage.