论文部分内容阅读
《汉书·艺文志》所著录的文献并不是当时所有实存文献的全部,从南宋王应麟到近代学者章太炎都曾对其阙收文献进行增补,从而在客观上系统地清理了先秦至西汉末年的文献散亡情况,为后人进一步研究这个时期的典籍和学术文化提供了较为完备的资料。只有结合历代学者的补阙所得,才能真正发挥《汉志》“辨章学术,考镜源流”的价值。然而,历代学者所补文献不尽完善:有些是没有形成文本的口传文献,有些不在《汉志》的收书范围之内,有些则以别名、异名或作为其它文献的一部分已然为《汉志》所著录。
The literary records of “Han Wen Yi Wen Zhi” are not all the documents of all the real accounts of the time. From Wang Yinglin in the Southern Song Dynasty to Zhang Taiyan in modern times, they all supplement their queer documents, so that objectively and systematically clean up the literature from the pre-Qin period to the late Western Han Dynasty Literature dissemination of the situation for future generations to further study this period of literature and academic culture provides a more complete information. Only with the complement of ancient scholars complement income, can we really play “Han” “chapter chapter academic, examination source ” value. However, there are still some inadequacies in the literature of ancient scholars: some are not formed oral oral literature, some are not within the scope of Han’s collection of books, others are alias, synonyms or as part of other documents Zhi "by the record.