论文部分内容阅读
通过解读《非性:从非性出发来与黑格尔交涉》这份手稿,可探讨海德格尔与黑格尔关于非性概念的交涉,厘清两者对于非性概念的理解的根本性歧异。海德格尔认为,非性在黑格尔的理念主义哲学中提供了绝对理念实现自身的动力,然而,黑格尔没有探究非性本身,非性的起源等问题。运用诠释的良善原则,结合海德格尔在写作这份手稿的同期或是前后期的著述,可以构建起他关于非性的一种较为圆熟的话语,即一种作为本源性的、历史性的“无”的非性,非性之起源即是深渊一般的疏朗之境的绽开。非性的根本性意味着存有的无基础性,而恰是这种无基础性构成了存有之本质。
By interpreting the “non-sex: non-sexual negotiation with Hegel” manuscript, Heidegger and Hegel discussed the concept of non-sexual, to clarify the fundamental differences between the two understanding of non-sexual concepts . Heidegger argues that non-sex provides absolute motivation in Hegel’s philosophy of idealism. However, Hegel did not explore the issue of non-sexuality and non-sexual origin. By applying the principle of goodness of interpretation and combining with Heidegger’s writings in the same period or before and after the writing of this manuscript, he can build up a relatively mature discourse on non-sexuality as a source of historical “No ” non-sex, the origin of non-sex is the depths of the general loosening of the depths of the territory. Non-sexual fundamental means that there is no basis for the existence, but it is precisely this non-basis for the nature of existence.